The packaging of products should be avoided by the producer or consumer should avoid it?
The packaging of products should be avoided by the producer or not is a mootable topic. Where a significant number of people believe that product owner is liable for extra packaging of the products, others assert that consumer should avoid it. I strongly belive in the later notion and will elucidate further to support my points with required arguments and illustrations.
There are myriad of reasons which will explain further this fact, but the most preponderant one is that multiple layers of packaging for goods not only enhanced the price of the products but it will affect nature as well due to the enormus use of plastic which is not degradeable and will affect the environment on a serious note. However, because upcoming generation, sea life and the ecosystem will also get impacted due to this cause, we need to take care while keeping the longer view point.
Another pivotal aspect to support this point is that poisionous gases are emitting from them lead to the destruction of the mother nature. Moreover, customer should also care about the quality of product rather than packaging, because some attractive packaging of products are merely meant to attract consumer, instead provide worth of the things.
To recapitual, one can conclude that the vital prospective should be the proper utilization of the resources. Conseqently, good layer of packaging should only use to protect things and for longer use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re while keeping the longer view point. Another pivotal aspect to support this p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ly, good layer of packaging should only use to protect things and for longer use.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6321178574 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623931623932 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0838489409 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346675501407 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165175935357 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20753614125 0.0667982634062 311% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207856236959 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165345526038 0.056905535591 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.