In the past lecturers could teach a certain number of students in one lecture hall. With the development of new technology, it is hard to justify the reason to participate in the lecture physically and not via the Internet.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is your personal opinion?
In the earlier days, the educators could deliver lectures to a group of students in one classroom but now with the boom in technological advancement, it is getting harder to state reasons for their physical presence. It is agreed that it is difficult for justifying the reasons to be physically present in such gatherings while there is an alternative option, the internet.
The primary reason for this is that the time flexibility of online classes. The scholars might schedule their own time to learn the subjects taught since the digitalized academic materials facilitate the saving for reviewing it later. To illustrate, the tutors could either record their lessons and upload in YouTube or send links to tutees' email address or even post in students' common login page. These easily accessible options were not under limelight until the emergence of the internet.
Another connected reason is the possibility to access many experts at one time. Even if the novice is about to attend the lecture directly, there is less chance for him to meet many educators at the same place but with recent application software like Google hangout, it has become facile to gather knowledge from different people of the same field of study.
To conclude, while there is a better option to choose from with the advent of technology, learners tend not to get inclined to other choices. Unless there is a mandatory need to get enrolled for the lectures in person, undoubtedly they prefer online classes. My personal viewpoint is that this way of updated learning has become more useful because of the ease provided to manage their time properly. Thus e-classrooms and tuitions are better to be preferred by the students of this modern era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 78 | view |
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 67
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. 73
- Today’s food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? 67
- Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses, nevertheless they are just as disabling in their own way. Society, however, is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities.To what 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 401, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...provided to manage their time properly. Thus e-classrooms and tuitions are better to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64047595995 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8630787262 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190051398643 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626734775194 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583592439199 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118641343871 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779945678476 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.