People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What can be done to make people drink less?
These days, an increasing number of sugar-based drinks consumed has been one of the fiercely debated issues. Although this trend can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be considered to address this.
There are two major reasons why people in this day and age tend to favor sugar-based drinks. The first reason is due to the changing lifestyle adopting to modern culture. This can be explained by the fact that people nowadays are likely to have fast foods with soft drinks, which is convenient for their living way. Second, the increased consumption of sugar-based drinks is linked to consumers’ lack of awareness and knowledge of a healthy diet. That is why people prefer nutrient-poor foods which include sugar-based drinks such as Coke or Pepsi.
However, there are a number of viable solutions to deal with this problem. One of these solutions is that government can impose a higher tax on the production and contribution of sugar-based drinks, which inevitably increases their price. Consequently, the usages of such drinks will be declined in many manners. Furthermore, there should be more educational propagation campaigns. If people are aware of side effects and health problems related to the increase of intake sugar such as Diabetes Mellitus, they will reduce consuming sugar-based drinks for their health benefits.
In conclusion, the problem of people having more and more sugar-based drinks is caused by a number of factors as discussed in the essay. Increasing taxes on sugar-based drinks and running propagation campaigns to raise consumers’ awareness of their health are two feasible solutions to combat such problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | Le Bich Diep | 73 | view |
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meats in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...convenient for their living way. Second, the increased consumption of sugar-based...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29962546816 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89494454099 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9390549449 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340584036926 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127262953961 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957734183476 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231772842044 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941801404758 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.