People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to such services?
In recent years, usage of language translating application has become very popular. This trending technological advancement is making language barrier a minimal issue. But like any other new invention translator apps are also associated with some drawbacks too. However, this essay will suggest that the advantages of this latest function outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, communication had to be a major obstacle regarding meeting new people from different parts of world. But the scenario has changed now. For example, using the language translator an American can be friends to an African even if they converse in different colloquialisms. Thus, this technology is connecting people from all over the world and contributing in the process of globalization.
Another worth mention-able benefit of language converter is the progression of tourism business. Due to complicacy of talking to a person of uncommon mother tongue, a plethora of tourist used to fear travelling to several specific countries. For instance, I personally know a person who really wanted to visit China but was afraid of going there because Chinese people speak Mandarin and some dialects of their own only. But, recently he came to know about an innovative voice translation machine called TripLingo and went to China without any delay. This indicates a great inclusion in travel industry.
Along with so many merits, language translator applications come up with few demerits also. To be specific, these language converting apps often deliver inaccurate result. The actual depth and meaning of a sentence may get changed due to low quality conversion. It may create misunderstanding and misconception among unknown individuals.
In conclusion, it can be reiterated that advantages of language decoding apps surpasses its shortcomings. It is helping the global citizens to get closer in context of friendship, traveling and many more.
- You want to improve your knowledge of foreign language which can help you at work Write a letter to a foreign language teacher and say Where did you hear about the teacher Why do you want to learn the foreign language Ask some questions about the course 90
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to such services? 84
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Some people think that children should be studying all the mandatory subjects until the age of ten, while others believe they should have an opinion to select favorite subjects to study. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relev 84
- You have recently visited a local school in your community It needs people who can help renovate the building and also help with some activities Write a letter to the principal of the school and say How would you be able to help When and why would you do 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ier a minimal issue. But like any other new invention translator apps are also associated wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... applications come up with few demerits also. To be specific, these language convert...
^^^^
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this language' or 'these languages'?
Suggestion: this language; these languages
...with few demerits also. To be specific, these language converting apps often deliver inaccurat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63175675676 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11476776245 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672297297297 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8029772644 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7368421053 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169716531107 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435612766787 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316235941588 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088441593616 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184194752867 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.