People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services.
Needless to say, the unprecedented upsurge in technological innovations has introduced multifarious gadgets (gismo) along with transformative applications. This essay will delve into merits and demerits of using the website-based language interpreting solutions
First and foremost, Internet-based translation portals offer a great number of benefits. These applications allow individuals to translate a majority of foreign languages into one’s native tongue in matter of seconds. To substantiate this viewpoint, such programs provide exceptionally good aid to communicate with local people effectively and helps to learn their culture as well. Also, in-person interpreters charge a significant amount of money to offer their job whereas web-based language converters can be purchased by paying a small price. In addition to that, these interactive programs can provide a great amount of help to learn a new language without paying a huge (handsome) amount of fee at language learning centers.
On the other hand, online language translators can be inaccurate numerous times and therefore are not worth relying on all the times, its mainly due to unreliable and inefficient computer algorithms. Consequently, the translated text can be inappropriate in a number of cases which can be misleading. Moreover, majority of cyber-based preeminent language conversion tools are required to have internet connection which is not available at many remote places across the world. In those circumstances such programs do not work.
In my opinion (to core out) , I believe that online language conversion portals are highly useful in a modern world ( contemporary era) and the advantages of such software outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | enassar | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | Gurpreet1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Sarab.rathor4@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Recently you have attended a job interview which went well, but you are still waiting for the result. Write a letter to HR manager of the company. In your letter, you should: give details of the job tell why you think the interview went well explain why y 73
- Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience. 67
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services. 67
- Write a letter to translation agency about the report to be translated urgently. In your letter, you should: explain the content of letter why you need translated report why do you need it urgently. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...innovations has introduced multifarious gadgets gismo along with transformative applica...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te-based language interpreting solutions First and foremost, Internet-based trans...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ot work. In my opinion to core out , I believe that online language conversi...
^^
Line 13, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tals are highly useful in a modern world contemporary era and the advantages of s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79215686275 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3294612011 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1986499925 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.272727273 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191147628177 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673341728378 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467661077912 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115126236067 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461066020878 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.