people doing dangerous sports activities like scuba diving and bunji jumping, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their lives to save people.
Do you agree or disagree?
When people practice a dangerous sport, they look for experiencing a unique adventure and raise their adrenaline levels to feel the glory of achievement, in the same time they risk their lives and expose themselves to a hazardous danger. Which made so many people calling for such sports players to be responsible for their own lives and their own rescue, without endangering the lives of the rescue workers. However, I completely contradict with such opinion, as rescuers and life guards are well trained and experienced to save other people lives in the most crucial situations.
Firstly, the occupation of rescue workers states that, they are professionally trained to deal with the risk and to manage saving the contestants from any danger. As they are familiar with the occurrence of any unexpected error. In addition to being experienced of maintain themselves safe while any rescue mission. For instance, people who do scuba diving can face many difficulties in breathing or adapting to water pressure differences below the water surface. In such situation, life guards would have the responsibility to rescue them easily without endangering themselves. As they already know how to first aid such breathing problems and include them with extra air tanks. Furthermore, they are well-trained to swim under low water levels. That is why the role of rescue worker is paramount in such dangerous sports.
Conversely, some people may accuse such sports doers of risking the rescue workers lives as well as theirs’. Such workers should not be forced to sacrifice their own lives to save whom looking for adventures. If these people are looking for a dangerous sport or an adventure, they should be responsible for the consequences of their choices. Moreover, the lifeguards should only interfere in situations which there are no risks on them. As per as, throwing a life jacket on swimmers. Without the existence of rescuers workers around, people will think twice before endangering themselves.
To conclude, although it sounds careless for people who practice dangerous sports to count on the rescuers to sacrifice their lives to secure them. Its obligatory for these workers to save people’s lives as they are qualified to break through risky situations with no harm.
In my opinion, a human life has a great value and are not replaceable. For that, one should save any life as long as they can. And for a profession of a rescuer or a life guard, it is there duty to step up and save people in dangerous no matter the hazard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | Megha Gupta | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Amirasenousi | 73 | view |
- you are working for a company. You need to take some time off work and want to ask your manager about this. Write a letter to your manager. In your letter. Explain why you want to take time off work Give details of the amount of time you nee 89
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 87
- people doing dangerous sports activities like scuba diving and bunji jumping, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their lives to save people.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country. You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for him/her.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter•Tell your f 89
- You saw a brochure for a one-week walking tour in the mountains. You're very interested in taking part, but you're not very fit and are worried you wouldn't be able to keep up. Write to the tour operator. In your letter:• Explain why you& 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...saving the contestants from any danger. As they are familiar with the occurrence o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08830548926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8165668662 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498806682578 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0736083012 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9090909091 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455066006437 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130517081558 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092164194634 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268343955967 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859059575765 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.