People prefer to communicate through social media and internet rather than face-to-face meetings. Is this positive or negative?
Communicating through Social media and the internet has been being preffered more than direct communication. I dissagree that communicating through different applications is the best. This essay shows the disadvantages of the usage of intentet programs.
On one hand, the exaggerated usage of Social network applications such as Facebook and WhatsApp are slowly killing activism and replacing it with slacktivism which leads to serious personal issues like introvertedness. Moreover, it creates a gap between family members and waists their time. In addition to that, media sharing has encouraged the public to use computers and mobile phones to express their concerns on social issues without actually having to engage actively with others in real life, which is against societal norms. For instance, a research has been published by a societal magazine in 2019 showed that the gab between family members increased by 30% from 2017 to 2018.
On the other hand, on work level, the rise of using internet communicating applications even while interviewing new employees harms their communication skills; People who depend on indirect communications with others, have a lack of personal communications skills. For example, in 2018 a study has been published by the New York Times newspaper reported that communication skills of people who are using interpersonal communications have a high level of communication skills rather than who depend on indirect communication during social media network.
In conclusion, the power of social media and the internet have shifted the balance from the hands of a few to the masses. Therefore, communications through them affects our social behaviour. I believe that Face- to- Face meetings are still the most effective way to communicate with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 78 | view |
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to countries where they cannot be grown or are out of season. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 73
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? 78
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...s against societal norms. For instance, a research has been published by a societal magazi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loyees harms their communication skills; People who depend on indirect communicat...
^^
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...vel of communication skills rather than who depend on indirect communication during...
^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ications through them affects our social behaviour. I believe that Face- to- Face...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54347826087 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12580802408 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.9846591997 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30162792467 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10889591792 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829934125858 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196941043252 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968281390796 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.