People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before. Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, innumerable career options are available for individuals to choose from. Everyone wants to buy several things to make their life easy. To fulfill such requirements, earning hefty amount is in vogue.Some school of thought arguing that whether it is a negative or positive development? I believe, this development has drawbacks and can lead to adverse consequences. I will elaborate it in detail in the later paragraphs.
To commence with, the most prominent demerit would be, people will become materialistic and will compare everything with the cost. Because the judgement of a person character will depend on the things he posses , it will create a sense of disrespect among masses. To illustrate, a survey revealed that today, masses give respect to others on the basis of clothes and, the house in which they resides and treat them accordingly. Thus, it would have bad impact on the mindset of people.
Besides this, it will stimulate more greed. Everyone will join the rat race and get busy in their work for long hours and it could hamper their relationship with loved ones. The distance will increase by time and it could lead to separation of families. To exemplify, in a magazine report , it was mentioned that professionals who stay busy in their work all the time, often face family troubles. Therefore, it can disturb the personal lives.
To conclude, I think, this progress would have several demerits. It would have damaging effects on the society and on the families as well. People should find out wise solutions to overcome these shortcomings otherwise they can face troubles in the upcoming future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | somu | 58 | view |
| 2020-03-18 | somu | 11 | view |
| 2020-03-18 | purinavdeep@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-18 | somu | 11 | view |
| 2020-03-18 | purinavdeep@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Television has changed the quality of life for the ordinary person Do you agree or disagree 66
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...ments, earning hefty amount is in vogue.Some school of thought arguing that whether ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cter will depend on the things he posses , it will create a sense of disrespect am...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'reside'
Suggestion: reside
...of clothes and, the house in which they resides and treat them accordingly. Thus, it wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lies. To exemplify, in a magazine report , it was mentioned that professionals who...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, so, therefore, thus, well, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09328358209 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76952106213 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0566973199 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2941176471 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917359365311 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251071873922 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357662718329 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541834474146 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377174920389 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.