A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons
With the time changing, social status and values also changing fast and people are judged in different manner in contrast to past times where prestige, kindness and trust were given weightage over money & social status. I believe that so called old fashioned values such as honor, love, compassion, trust are eternal and people of these qualities are revered everywhere.
People who think that social status and materialistic items should be considered while judging an individual have some valid points. Firstly, nowadays most of the youngsters believe in flaunting the items such as mobile phone, expensive car, apparels etc…, consequently, this has been the part of their prestige symbol and habits. For example, my sister who shifted to Mumbai and found that local people discard the others who are not wearing trendy cloths and consider them old fashioned. Secondly, people’s attitude towards life has changed drastically because of busy life and day to day struggle. As a result, people do not get time to help others and show their kind behavior.
However, people still value that universally accepted good qualities like help, compassion, love etc. and are given higher status in society. While people are busy in taking care of their life, there are people who devoted their life for others. For example, Mr. Kailash Satyarthi who won the noble prize for saving children from child labour and gave new life to them. Because of his selfless efforts to protect children, he is respectable in all countries and listed one of the famous personalities in the times magazine.
In conclusion, though people judge the other based on the place in society, money, cars, and big bungalow etc. which are items for living luxury life, everyone respect the people who exhibit the qualities like helping others, shows empathy, kind behavior and generosity, Irrespective of their materialistic belongings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | mary nabil | 56 | view |
- Techno Corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with curre 50
- Police in some countries like in England don’t carry guns. Some do not approve of this because they think that police with guns gives them security. Others think that police carrying guns decreases crimes. What is your opinion? 67
- Question: Write a letter to your neighbor. i your letter. Describe the problem. say how long it has been a problem.. Explain what action you want the neighbors to take 84
- Question: You ordered an item on a company website, which should have been delivered the next day, but it never turned up. Write a letter to the manager and saywhat was the item .why it was important that you get it immediately.what you suggest the compan 87
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
... one of the famous personalities in the times magazine. In conclusion, though people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26229508197 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57459309899 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63606557377 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5599251084 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110317582455 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407111751114 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387406951027 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749164253903 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564165094589 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.