Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is no deny that there are various medium of entertainment like books, magazines, films and televisions. Some people argue that reading book is more beneficial than spending copious amount of hours seeing cinemas and television. I tend to believe that it is much useful reading books instead of watching movies.
To begin with, books enhances human knowledge and we learn new skills whether personal, professional or about art and world affairs aides to grow us as an individual. For example, a book on latest computer science could be helpful in learn new computer programming language which will add more value to resume of a professional thus help them in their career. Secondly, research has also shown that a person who is in habit of constant reading learns faster, adapts to new situations faster in comparison to other human being who just waste their time watching daily soap operas which have no value in life.
One of the major issue with watching movies and television is that one just sits idle at one place doing nothing except eating. For example, There have been ample of cases where people have gained significant weight due to just sitting and this leads to health issues from an early age. Where as when we read text materials we become more engaged with story and use our imagination which opens up creative mind to see possibilities which we cannot comprehend even using visual medium of entertainment.
In conclusion, movies and other mediums are not helpful in building one's creative ability although some movies are more engaging than books. There are more number of books which are far ahead of their counterparts in terms of making a person better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...ads to health issues from an early age. Where as when we read text materials we become m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96819787986 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53557145455 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6661946845 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.818181818 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163790758249 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620114847081 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418439594599 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944845902751 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178959389145 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.