In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that these days purchasing goods at supermarkets or malls are significantly increasing which leads to a falling number of small local shops. In my opinion, there are both benefits and drawbacks of this development.
On the one hand, it is obvious that there are several disadvantages when small shops are closed. Firstly, shopping in the supermarket usually takes plenty of time and money to travel, and in some cases, it is not convenient for people who just want to buy small things. This is because shopping malls are often far from their house. Furthermore, the price of products in shopping centres is often higher than that in small shops. This could be attributed to the fact that small shops do not need to pay more additional fees such as security, the system of air-conditioning. As a result, such factors could encourage certain groups of people with low income from going shopping comfortably instead of paying unnecessary costs
On the other hand we cannot deny that buying goods in big shops brings many advantages. The first benefit is that supermarkets always supply a wide range of products with good quality and selling services. My wife, for example, bought a new dress but she found that there was a minor defect on it when at home. The shop manager promptly changed another one for my wife when receiving a complaint from her. Therefore, people can trust in buy whatever they need to serve their daily life. In addition, shopping in malls would foster family’s relationship. This is because such destinations are ideal places for family members to enjoy quality time together.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that buying products in big shopping centres or malls are dramatically raising resulting in many small shops have stopped which have not only advantages but also disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | minoozafaryan | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | hoangquang | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | hoangquang | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y advantages but also disadvantages.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05592105263 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77855788426 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9193698137 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359291629026 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118585158189 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892824765514 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212262705073 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987430618608 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.