Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
There are some old buildings in large cities needed to renew because they are unusable. The states are responsible for providing the expenditure of this action which also is really expensive. It appears that spending the budget of governments to restore the old buildings is not reasonable and because of some reasons, it should be spent on building new houses and roads which I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, spending a lot of money in order to renew the old buildings is not only a waste of time, but also a waste of money meaning that the old houses need to be made different changes in terms of interior and exterior of structures which are quite expensive projects in which various architects have to be employed to achieve the best result. An example can be seen in some projects to restore the valuable historical buildings. Although these types of buildings are usually simple in structures, the governments have to spend much money on restoring. In addition, a second and perhaps most significant reason is that the more modern the cities are, the more up-to-date the buildings they need. As a result, the restoration of ancient buildings cannot be beneficial in today's world. If the states try to spend the budget on building some new houses and roads, they will be more useful not only for people but also for their countries in terms of the global views.
It is true that the expenditure on constructing new buildings and roads could also be expensive. As well as this some old buildings are worthy in terms of being a symbol of a country. Despite this, it seems that modern cities need some buildings with modern facilities to be in accordance with today's needs.
To conclude, the governments have to consider much more expenditure to build new buildings and roads. However, the old buildings are considered more significant in terms of background and history.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87577639752 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68475342066 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453416149068 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2571369637 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377966976644 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150200423782 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583868599784 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253736311828 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451012622514 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.