The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion
The researchers in the modern world believe that the electric device seems to far outweigh the human. It would be argued by some that It is favorable. In contrast, I strongly think that it is an adverse progress.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that It is positive
The first one is that in calculating, a computer can calculate so quickly and properly even those are complicated operations while the human may make an error on it, therefore It will be beneficial for them to save time.
Another reason is that you can obtain several benefits brought by this development such as calling a friend who far away from a thousand of kilometers, buying and paying easily needed items without going out.
On the other hand, I would argue that It is a negative development
First of all, the more useful, the more dependent, this is one of the leading causes which make people lazier, My co-worker, for example, She was working and had to compute a simple an operation as her habit she forced the computer to make it.
Finally, Many expert people who are convinced of the harmfulness of technical development. Muslon and Stephan Hawking, for instance, They both have warned that Artificial Intelligence is highly likely to destroy humans and at some time in the future, AI will be out of control, It will be a threat to people.
In conclusion, although, some think that the growth of computers is a supportive revolution but I personally believe that It is disadvantageous one.
- The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'adverse progress'.
Suggestion: adverse progress
...n contrast, I strongly think that it is an adverse progress. On the one hand, there are a number o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77099236641 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75594721146 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.2704279201 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.888888889 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.3333333333 7.06120827912 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220783113896 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796175384484 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425994110557 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927735235657 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409880982331 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.