Scientists believe that computers not humans will control cars in the near future What are the reasons for that Would this be a positive or a negative development

Essay topics:

Scientists believe that computers, not humans, will control cars in the near future. What are the reasons for that? Would this be a positive or a negative development?

This will not be incorrect to say that artificial intelligence will be the future of the human world. Some argues for the positive and negative effects this change can bring to mankind. This essay discusses the reasons for use of system-controlled cars in the future and favors its advantages.

To begin, the belief of scientists that in the near future cars will be controlled automatically is totally correct. Advancements in artificial intelligence come as the main reason behind this faith. For instance, robots have already been in use in restaurants, malls, and institutions, which proves the reliability of AI. The second reason for this trust comes from the trials of AI-driven Google cars. Moreover, these trials have given satisfying and trusted results. Such as, no accidents were reported and no rules were broken in any of the trials.

After highlighting the reasons for the faith in artificial intelligence, this paragraph explores the advantages of self-driven cars. Firstly, this will be like a boon to old and handicapped people. Because the user only needs to tell the destination address and nothing more is required to be taken care of. Secondly, this will reduce accidents because under no circumstances the car will break the traffic rules, furthermore, there will never be reckless driving due to tiredness and hurry.

To sum up, the day is not far when self-driven cars will be in the market for sale. In fact, the journey has already started with human's faith in robots and trials and improvements in google cars. Besides, this technology will bring immense benefits and convenience to the users and their arrival will completely change our world.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-19 nalineeSingh 61 view
Essays by user nalineeSingh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16988416988 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91716153099 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0432281148 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354557508988 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119387454148 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951292635317 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23839686231 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810818229635 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.