It is no denying that technology equipment a more pivotal role for serval people in existing time. Therefore, scientists considering whether computers will become enough intelligent as human beings. Although, few masses of argued it will beneficial development, in contrary side unfavourable development in upcoming life. I will explain both views in the upcoming paragraph.
Commencing with the would-be enough salient helpful development of the human life. Owing to, in the modern era more alters in human lifestyle, since on this screen available social website instead of they easily talking with friends and relatives, who lived another nation. Moreover, it very rapidly helps in business work every day in the phenomenon as well as they are easily saving related business data in electronic equipment. Due to, they feel like relaxation. Ergo, it is fact that despite individual life look at more changes today time.
On another side, few masses think that how it is a negative development for the upcoming generation life. Most masses believe that computer not only harmless, but also people will addict it. For example, it can be observed whether nowadays which bad impact on infants life, who more time spent on this computer screen and they are avoided too har hard work. In addition, they do not use their physical skill and more preference the technology equipment, therefore, it is clear that hazardous influence on future.
To sum up, while the computer is a more crucial role in the day to day scenario. Although, the trend of computer has more advantage, yet we can not ignore the awful effects of this trend on infants life.
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Advertising influences people to buy things such as clothes and shoes What are the problems caused by that What solutions can be given 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'infants'' or 'infant's'?
Suggestion: infants'; infant's
...ed whether nowadays which bad impact on infants life, who more time spent on this compu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'infants'' or 'infant's'?
Suggestion: infants'; infant's
...nore the awful effects of this trend on infants life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66036496927 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2172160775 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220813280217 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074350692854 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554230183233 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133532963478 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557804953392 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.