Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Due to globalization, scientists have predicted that people will be speaking one universal language in the near future. I believe that this phenomenon will have a negative impact on the culture and employment ratio of a country.
Undoubtedly, a single language universal language has its own benefits. Most important advantage will be easy communication between people. Relations between nations will improve which will result in the local and global economic growth. For instance, tourists can travel anywhere without the fear of having a language barrier. Many times, it has been reported that vacationers suffer a lot mentally and physically just because of miscommunication. There have been instances where people have landed in legal trouble as they were not able to comprehend the rules and regulations of the host country.
Nevertheless, the negative effects far outweigh the positive developments. One of the major adverse impacts will be damage to the culture of a country. Language represents the cultural identity of the people. Slowly and steadily, the local languages will perish and the history and culture will be lost with it. For example, recent studies suggest that some parts of Africa have lost 20% of its indigenous languages and traditions in the past century due to the adoption of English as a global language. It is an alarming trend because it will eventually lead to a loss of historical languages and precious artifacts and manuscripts will be left without any understanding.
Furthermore, the employment of a large section of society will be lost. With globalization, travel has become much easier and people travel to different places nearly every time of the year. Tourism is one of the major industry of a country and a big marker of its GDP. Local guides and language interpreters contribute a lot to the economy. If everyone would speak the same language, no one would need them and it will result in huge unemployment. Also, the local population will also lose interest in their own background and way of life sooner or later.
To conclude, having a global language has its own benefits but it will create unemployment and risk the culture and history of a country. Therefore, I strongly believe that it will have a negative effect on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | gillmandeep0260 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
- You need to shift your flat and in this connection you are looking for a new flat. You have seen an advertisement in the local newspaper.Now write a letter to the owner of the flat asking to provide you with required information. 78
- Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or a negative development? 56
- You would like to buy some electrical goods at a shop in a town which is far from your home.Write a letter to the manager of the shop. In your letter:say which electrical goods you wantask questions about the cost of the goods and how to payexplain how yo 56
- The core essentiality of existing in today’s world is digital acceptance and usage. It is widely coexistent in every sphere of life. Moreover, children are greatly influenced because it stems in their education and their entertainment. Kids don’t pref 11
- Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys? Why is it happening? Is it a positive or negative development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14209115282 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92778579272 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533512064343 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2632311416 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228612924985 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688223200034 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499354269451 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147209238601 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560701045631 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.