Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is becoming increasingly common to hear that linguistics have been predicted that people will be enthusiastic in talking with a unique language in near future. From my perspective, this notion has both its merits and demerits.
An obvious argument in its favor is that it brings peace and stability for the world. The first and for the most, it makes borders will be dull and meaningless. Indeed, languages play a significant role in drawing distinction between nations. But these differences will be less if all people speak in same language. According to historical evidences, there were some unprovoked war due to dispute for differences between languages. Besides, speaking in one language stimulants sense of equality between nations and it definitely averts war.
On the flip side, language would be secluded if they didn’t use by communities. To dig a little deeper, languages have evolved over thousands of years. Moreover, they are icons of nation’s heritage. But not using of them will lead to their forgetfulness day in, day out. So that the next generations would not be familiar with their ancestor’s indigenous language. For instance, there were a lot of linguistics that had made a lot of efforts to uphold the Persian language. Unfortunately, by penetrating foreign languages such as English, French and German, their efforts were in vain and some elegant and valuable Persian words has been forgotten and are not using by youth.
In conclusion, using a unique language in world has various benefits but it has also some drawbacks that should be considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to their forgetfulness day in, day out. So that the next generations would not be famil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18677042802 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93269595028 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8871680124 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3125 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136227913865 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042437379428 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515300098403 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851376812118 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495582595281 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.