Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
Lifestyle in today’s era has attained an utmost important and has been touching in every aspect of humankind. Decision about once lifestyle is dominated by various factors and phases of life. Now the question which people is bothered about right to decide about once lifestyle. Should this rights rests with government or once himself. In my views, lifestyle should be based on persons own choice.
In alternative words, vitality of lifestyle can be understood from the fact that people live and earn to maintain their lifestyle. People lifestyle dictates the quantum of efforts they will do in their workplace. Lifestyle is much more broader term and does not restricts itself to the limits of fashion, having luxurious ornaments etc. Lifestyle covers as minute as their taste of food and expands as much as first class travel in airlines. Considering the fact and vitality of lifestyle in their life, it will not be tolerable for the any human being to let other decide and control their life and leaving them puppet to follow the order.
Secondly, decision related to once lifestyle is everybody’s fundamental right one is born with. Government need to extend freedom to its people to enjoy fundamental rights and should not interfere. There are variety of ways for government to convince people to adapt a particular kind of lifestyle in case government requires them to adhere to such as personal appeal though various media channels, promoting and spreading awareness of such pattern or trend etc. But right to decide lies with one self and cannot be captured by government.
To conclude, last but not the least, “Government is for people, People are not for government”. Alike true parents, Government should shows them ways to have good and socially acceptable lifestyle and leave rest the wisdom of people to adapt it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Punm | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | gsw.singh@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | maninder.vadhrah1988@gmail.com | 93 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree?Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactiv 84
- All societies have their own music and art In what way are music and art important for society and for the individual 72
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'broader' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: broader
...o in their workplace. Lifestyle is much more broader term and does not restricts itself to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restrict'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: restrict
... is much more broader term and does not restricts itself to the limits of fashion, having...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'restrict'
Suggestion: restrict
... is much more broader term and does not restricts itself to the limits of fashion, having...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rest the wisdom of people to adapt it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15562913907 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80219523674 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3465173478 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300232384706 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101484857786 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628271533683 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194533758332 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589587103727 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.