Should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In my opinion, most of the long-term job seekers who receive government benefits usually take the job for granted. Hence, they get too comfortable with the benefits and job security that they tend to forget their social responsibilities towards the community and locality. If they are made to do voluntary work they will get out of their comfort zones and look at the bigger picture for the community and its well-being.
There are many workers from various NGOs who are working for welfare of the locality without thinking of benefits or rewards. If the job seekers have a sedentary life style this work will bring a certain amount of joy alongwith welfare for the society. A few things that they can take up as voluntary work could be : cleanliness campaign, teaching skills to the kids, gardening to beautify the local areas, creative decoration of walls to beautify the surroundings and add an aesthetic appeal, helping the healthcare workers with their skills etc.
Moreover, job seekers are well-educated & have good skill sets. If they take some time out from their schedules and teach the kids voluntarily, the kids will not only learn new skills efficiently but also interact with all kinds of people and learn life lessons. The work life is sedentary and helping clean and beautify the surroundings will add a creative spark to the community and the people doing it.
During my job tenure, I use to help people with free coaching classes of poor students who are unable to pay for private tution. This way you can help others as well as students can have better knowledge to enlighten their future.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 67
- Science gives people life expectancies of close to 100 years or even more. Some people view it in a positive light but others believe it creates some problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- You recently used a taxi and left some important documents there Write a letter to the taxi manager and say Describe what you left and where it happened Why are these papers important What would you like the manager to do about it
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...le doing it. During my job tenure, I use to help people with free coaching class...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92673992674 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59997202782 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0788927713 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202390735826 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084220710206 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518201739489 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12166069969 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757103908153 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.