Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Financial difference is the vital reason to indicate difference between poor and rich people in terms of pattern of lifestyle, level of education, basic manners and so on. Resulting in increasing crime to get the equal rights and so on. In order to reduce this diversity, government must take active steps to maintain unity among all. This essay will discuss what exactly needs to be done to eliminate this basic problem of citizens.
As we all know that, we are belonging from third world country where mostly people are suffering from economical inequality. There are two ways to solve it. As per my opinion, committee must take initiative to take care of these. Firstly, government body would be creating a common system through which people may cover their basic needs for daily life. As an example, country like India, where people are fighting to fulfill their daily necessity. Being an elected body of the nation, there will be a smooth layout of system with concrete rules to assure daily food and proper education to every single folks and children.
Secondly, if government is unable to satisfy the needs by their own then we can go with this option. We have been witness of many situations, when natural disaster happens and we have got ample amount of help from wealthy nations like Japan, America and so on. For an example, during the Kerala flood, different first world counties came forward to aid us. Similarly, we also did the same during their problems. But still taking help from wealthy country is not always good idea. In short, government must try their level best to assist their people instead of going to developed countries.
To summarized, every nation has it's own rules, regulations, system to control the entire country in terms for assured food, shelter and proper education to every citizen.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 63
- Write a letter to the admissions tutor and explain your position Apologise and offer to come on another day or later the same day Ask also how long the interview will be and whether there will be any tests during it 88
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time say what action 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
...f citizens. As we all know that, we are belonging from third world country where mostly p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...f citizens. As we all know that, we are belonging from third world country where mostly p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'develop'
Suggestion: develop
...assist their people instead of going to developed countries. To summarized, every nati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, third, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94805194805 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4036326306 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7266603846 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173842737977 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493910630677 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475601374315 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104375147144 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421986110937 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.