Should long term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge experience

Essay topics:

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge experience.

Being a responsible citizen of the country, contribute some valuable time towards the community is a basic duty. Spending time with local people allows to you to recognize the common on going issues. We often noticed that several local people and NGOs have been linked with such work to assist poor people. Although, it is a quite debatable topic as it depends on individuals standpoint. In this article, we will see the positive points supporting of involving into voluntary work and some personal experiences as well.

It is known to all that long-term job-seekers are availing an array of government benefits. There are numerous ways including direct and indirect through which one can involve and contribute into voluntary work. For example, they could extract some time from their busy schedule at weekend to provide free tuition classes to local kids. Lots of campaigns are happening nowadays which is a great medium to donate old clothes, books and stationaries, groceries etcetera to the low income families. Besides this, blood donation camp are another opportunity of involve yourself into a voluntary work. All these activity will never cost you a lot but this could be a great way to give something back to the community.

I would like to share my own experience when I used to provide free tuition and music class at every weekend to the local kids in my locality. This was an incredible feelings when you share knowledge to others. Although, one may not earn money out of it but I believe you could feel great.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e allows to you to recognize the common on going issues. We often noticed that several l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... quite debatable topic as it depends on individuals standpoint. In this article, we will se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this activity' or 'these activities'?
Suggestion: this activity; these activities
...lve yourself into a voluntary work. All these activity will never cost you a lot but this coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feeling'?
Suggestion: feeling
... in my locality. This was an incredible feelings when you share knowledge to others. Al...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, may, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94186046512 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61523378487 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1173775116 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152020777678 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462109711574 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428016773434 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886449409238 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575848089853 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.