Should travelling be included in the education? Discuss and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Should travelling be included in the education? Discuss and give your opinion.

Since the beginning of the recorded time, aboriginals have always been interested in learning by the mean of travelling around the globe. Has it be explorers such as Columbus, Darwin or other prominent wanderers, this world was explored and discovered by sightseeing. In the wake of education with travelling, the majority of institutions have included sight visiting as a predominant determinant while designing a course. Some people believe learning by seeing is propitious for scholars; however, other claims the opposite. I will discuss both the sides in the viability of the argument and state an opinion.

On the one hand, opponents of adding travelling in education claim that it will hinder students to excel academically. Firstly, subjects like Mathematics, Physics and Information Technology do not require a pupil to see a sight or travel to learn them. For an example, if someone wants to be a mathematician, he must be excellent in mathematical skills and travelling to places will not add value for such students in learning and assimilating scientific concepts. Therefore, travelling has no importance in learning these subjects. Secondly, the exchange program to learn can act as a hinder in learning, as every country will have its own set of educational standards, which may not be suitable for every student. Thus, many contend that adding travelling in the curriculum is not viable and beneficial for scholars.

On the other hand, proponents of assimilating travelling as a determinant in learning claim various rationales in support of the opinion. One the most profuse reason is on account of learning associated with practical knowledge. These advocates also assert that practical learning by sightseeing inculcates a permanent learning among the scholars, which is mandatory for the overall development of students. It can be confirmed by the latest report of education society of India, which has published the statistics of experiments on students. As per experiment, pupils were divided into two groups and taught a lesson in two different ways, the first group was taught theoretically and another group was taught practically by showing the actual sight. As per results, children taught using sightseeing were able to retain the information for 20 days extra than the students educated theoretically. Likewise, students can learn more if they will travel to other countries. It will not only impart an impetus to their academic learning, but also it will infuse cross-cultural understanding. Consequently, it will enhance the overall growth of students.

To sum up, after discussing both sides of the argument, I am convinced that advantages of adding travelling in education overweigh the disadvantages and it must be encouraged for the overall academic and social development of the scholars.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 LaraNg 67 view
2020-12-02 Krutika Barot 61 view
2020-06-07 omuruzua 89 view
2020-06-07 zukky 78 view
2019-10-29 Nomin123 89 view
Essays by user Saira Faiz :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... of travelling around the globe. Has it be explorers such as Columbus, Darwin or o...
^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... of travelling around the globe. Has it be explorers such as Columbus, Darwin or o...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to claim'
Suggestion: to claim
...travelling as a determinant in learning claim various rationales in support of the op...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39954853273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13972034768 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530474040632 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7237420531 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.904761905 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193547822319 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589611660914 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475036925564 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135735468234 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333263166545 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.