It is often argued that rich countries should help less developed countries by giving basic facilities while other endorse the idea that it should be taking care by the government of poor countries. I personally believe that such responsibility should be to share by the government of the nation as a well as the wealthy countries.
More privileged nations can have underdeveloped countries through providing the basic necessities of life such as food and education. In this way, a friendly relationship between countries will develop and enhance the sense of responsibility and liability for each other. Moreover, rich nations can also accept refugees from such countries where life circumstances are unacceptable, hence results in a better standard of living of such people, consequently, these people can help their home country to flourish and prosper. For instance, few countries like Canada help underdeveloped countries such as Syria by accepting refugees, in this way, there is a possibility of their survival and their country in the long run.
On the other hand, it is also the duty of country’s government to provide and fulfill the basic needs of life as it is the right of citizens living in such countries. The government should build schools which are, if not free of cost, should at least reasonable enough to be afforded by all. So that every person can gain a basic education and improve his standard of living. Furthermore, the providence of food is also one of the major responsibilities which should be looked after by the government. All the main items of the meal should be available in every part of the country at the cheapest price possible as in this way almost everyone can have much food to survive.
In conclusion, the government of the poor nation is responsible for the provision basic amenities of life, however, wealthy countries can also play a vital role in helping in such cause.
- Some people prefer hobbies that require technology while some people hobbies does not require technology Discuss the both views and give your opinion 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 78
- nowadays more and more movies and music are available on internet at free of cost this is positive or negative development give valid reasons 62
- Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...veloped countries through providing the basic necessities of life such as food and education. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a vital role in helping in such cause.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07836990596 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97477463128 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1749509425 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268986509249 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117871318249 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850179520898 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176272892539 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274303102646 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.