Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
some people think that beating children is by far an excellent way to teach them. I completely disagree with the notion of thrashing the little ones as it is morally incorrect, at the same time, it is unnecessary.
Hitting a child is entirely preposterous for many reasons. Firstly, it is the basic human rights which do not permit hitting anybody. it states that even the criminals should be dealt humanely, so why should children bear the suffering just for not behaving properly? Secondly, it is immoral to inflict pain to little ones. people, in some cultures, believe that infants are the gift of god. If it is so, then it would be a sinful act to beat them in their growing stages. For instance, nursing mothers thrash their babies for being reluctant to drink milk, which is gruesome.
Moving on, I believe that there is no necessity to beat these curious minds. children, in their most formative years, have a proclivity towards whatever catches their eye. In other words, during the learning stage of brain, it is the only way by which they learn about their outside world. Further, they might not only need more time to adapt to things taught but also be unruly sometimes. it is the parents who must learn the child’s physiology and train them accordingly. For example, some toddlers might grasp the ability to walk early while others might not withstand with it. so, instead of beating, an easy-going learning process is a better approach.
In conclusion, smacking the little ones is not a good idea to reinforce teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that universities should only accept students with high marks. Others think that students of all ages and ability levels should be able to attend universities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Smacking children is the best way to discipline children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The use of mobile phones in public places is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should be banned in the same way. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Excessive traffic has made cities unpleasant places to live and work in. For this reason, private cars should be completely banned from city centres. To what extent do you agree or disagee? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people think that beating children is b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ts which do not permit hitting anybody. it states that even the criminals should b...
^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...immoral to inflict pain to little ones. people, in some cultures, believe that infants...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
... necessity to beat these curious minds. children, in their most formative years, have a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...gs taught but also be unruly sometimes. it is the parents who must learn the child...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92045454545 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53705323524 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643939393939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3157585483 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4117647059 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0565148085554 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0165712301485 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228107974816 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426560927157 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204838019544 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.