Smacking children to is the best method to discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
If there were ever a vote to select the most effective way of parenting, there will not be a clear winner. However, if asked to cite the toughest challenge of parenting, the unwavering answer would be disciplining children. While many parents will consider a lenient smack-free way of raising children, I would beg to disagree and be of the opinion that some form of reprimand is important for disciplining young kids.
To begin with, the potential drawback of the non-strict parenting style is that kids often grow-up to feel entitled. To illustrate, every supermarket will almost always have a young parent giving in to the tantrums of their children in order to cajole them. What this leads to, is that kids learn this behavioural pattern, and repeat the action later. Moreover, they are now aware that the parent will heed in to their demands sooner or later. Since they have been raised in an environment where all their whims and fancies were served without any reprimand, such kids feel entitled to get everything in the world, without working for it. Moreover, this character trait causes massive issues in later years of life. Unfortunately, when faced with the harsh realities of life, the once spoilt-kids, are mentally not prepared to handle the challenges.
On the other hand, kids who had a loving but at the same time a disciplined childhood, tend to grow up as realistic and responsible adults. For example, in many of the Asian countries, the recommended parenting style is to give complete freedom to kids until they turn 5, follow strict discipline for age 5-12 years, and to be a friend to the kids when they turn into teenagers. The period through the ages of 5-14 is when the child is at a very impressionable age. Therefore, it is necessary that real values be taught to the children during these formative years. Upon misbehaving, firstly, the kid should be mildly reprimanded. This in most cases resolves the issue. However, if the lesson is not learned, a strict disciplinary action must be taken. This ensures that the youngster imbibes the teachings, which in effect will make them a better adult. As a result, the kids are not spoilt and learn the value of hard work and discipline.
To conclude, I agree with the age old adage of spare the rod, and spoil the child. However, since none of the parents want their children to hate them, it is imperative to maintain the right blend of freedom, discipline and friendship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-18 | vishal sachdeva | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-14 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-14 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 78 | view |
- Smacking children to is the best method to discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In developing countries Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people to improve their quality of life Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term Discuss both these views a 84
- In developing countries Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people in order to improve their quality of life Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term Discuss both thes 84
- Countries should restrict foreign companies from opening offices and factories in order to protect local businesses Do you agree or disagree Give reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 76
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears. Upon misbehaving, firstly, the kid should be mildly reprimanded. This in mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, in most cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85238095238 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68459534273 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7838179671 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0476190476 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100697619053 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270276383598 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389145110154 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730582868656 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428627279802 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.