Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is an opinion that the school budget should mainly be allocated to computers. Meanwhile, there are those who argue that qualification of teaching staff is more important and this money should be spent on salaries. In this essay I will consider both sides of the argument and then give my own opinion.
First group may support the idea that modern children are growing up in the time when technology is rapidly evolving. That is why it is necessary to provide modern computer classes for every educational establishment. It will help children to become familiar with computer science without respect to the economic status of their families. In addition, computers might be useful for learning other subjects as nowadays there are many programs for learning purposes.
However, their opponents believe that computers cannot replace teachers as learning is not a linear process. Frequently success in learning directly depends on the psychology and ability of a teacher to interact with a child. Moreover, a teacher plays significant role development of a child as a person, their ability to resolve conflicts, effective communication and etc. This demands emotional connection and computers are not suitable for it. For example, some youngsters might not be good in precise science but at the same time they might have creative minds and achieve success in arts. The main task of a teacher to discover a child’s talent.
In conclusion, having considered both sides of the argument, I think that despite the fact that technology is important, educational personnel contribute more in students’ learning process. Thus, the main part of finances has to be spent on better salaries for them in order to involve professionals in the teaching process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | Mariamirabella | 85 | view |
| 2020-05-15 | kjot_59 | 91 | view |
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion? 78
- Some people say that everyone can make art eg painting music poetry others believe that it can only be made by those withspecial ability Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Write a letter to invite an English speaking friend to watch a movie with you about your country In your letter Include some background about the film Explain why it might interest him her Suggest arrangements for watching the film 67
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 54
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household tasks To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...olve conflicts, effective communication and etc. This demands emotional connection and c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...l contribute more in students’ learning process. Thus, the main part of finances has to...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professionals in the teaching process.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24113475177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84918430691 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5682872336 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321299003703 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901453629175 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609821656926 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171612152734 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489118211457 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...olve conflicts, effective communication and etc. This demands emotional connection and c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...l contribute more in students’ learning process. Thus, the main part of finances has to...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professionals in the teaching process.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24113475177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84918430691 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5682872336 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321299003703 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901453629175 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609821656926 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171612152734 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489118211457 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.