Today’s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an opinion that contemporary school's programs require a subject on financial literacy. I totally agree with this notion because the youth and even a lot of adults, nowadays, tend to spend more money than they can afford.
First, with the appearance of the Internet modern schoolchildren have got many opportunities to earn extra money and it is obvious that they need not blow them off but rather use the received profit for building their future financial stability or even independence. Thus, if learning institutions provide them with sufficient knowledge of economics and budget maintaining, they will be able to save and gain their finances in the future. For example, my younger brother was working in a car wash last summer, but, unfortunately, he had thrown away all his salary on parties and fun later in the year instead of investing it.
In addition, a large number of people take a lot of loans, when payments on them are in excess of their income. This is exactly why schools have to provide the youngsters from an early beginning with knowledge of how to maintain a person's budget and stay out of debt. Children ought to be aware of how to do it properly as financial survival is a crucial skill for a prosperous life. For instance, one of my friends after receiving a good bunch of money from his grandfather invested in them, while his peers went on vacation to Ibiza. Later it paid off and he was able to pay for his further education in a university without taking an educational loan.
In conclusion, I completely agree that schools should be responsible for the financial literacy of their students. This is because planning budget is an essential skill for survival in modern society and children have to learn this skill from primary school until graduation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | Mariamirabella | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | monicamanti | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-16 | Kamran2555 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | balwinderbuttar01 | 73 | view |
- Some people would say that parents should pay their children for small home duties cleaning washing dishes Other would disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- More and more people today are becoming overly dependent on the internet and phones Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Some people say young people should be completely free to choose their future job but others think young people must be more realistic in their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits to living in cities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nstead of investing it. In addition, a large number of people take a lot of loans, when paymen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87296416938 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75323119605 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3911746735 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171668926303 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682664301257 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546077578141 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114945903472 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424616358448 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nstead of investing it. In addition, a large number of people take a lot of loans, when paymen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87296416938 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75323119605 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3911746735 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171668926303 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682664301257 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546077578141 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114945903472 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424616358448 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.