In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
At present, personal transport plays an important in communities. However, the flow of vehicles can be unsatisfactory due to frequent congestions. This essay will consider the cause of this difficulty and suggest possible solutions.
Let us start with reasons for the high load of transport routes in cities. The first cause is that highways often have a poor design. Cities are initially constructed for a limited population, but over time the number of citizens exceeds the norms, which leads to an overflow of cars on the roads. Another reason is that automobiles are affordable for people. In some urban areas, where the number of inhabitants never grows, families tend to possess more than one car, because vehicles are cheap, and the tax on their usage is low, which also exacerbate the situation with traffic. Furthermore, the current public transport is insufficient in number. In many big cities, the number of buses, which has already surpassed the maximum, cannot deal with a growing flow of passengers.
However, the authorities can tackle traffic congestions by the following measures. Firstly, the city authorities should redesign main roads. Drivers would experience a better flow of traffic, if both road architects and engineers would either widened the narrow streets or made some roads one-way. Secondly, the state should raise car taxes. The wish to buy another car would decrease in society, as soon as the government increased the taxation on exploiting cars. Moreover, it should develop other modes of public transport. Apart from buses, city councils can both establish highways or promote cycling, which would cut the volume of cars at the rush hours.
In conclusion, there are many causes of overly intensive traffic in urban regions, but it is possible to deal with them by taking the above mentioned steps by the government.
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Are romantic movies damaging to real relationship 86
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 78
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. Causes and solutions. 78
- You are renting a flat from an agency Your contract was for one year but you need to leave the flat two months early Write a letter to the agency In your letter introduce yourself ask to leave the flat before the contract finishes explain why you need to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 629, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: insufficient
...ermore, the current public transport is insufficient in number. In many big cities, the number of buse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experience a better flow of traffic, if both road architects and engineers would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2474916388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72576687113 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3155936574 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141473465218 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385514066448 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418683709659 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885737015123 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335371878 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.