While in some cities is more common to find, as habitational solution, houses on a wider area of land, in others the place to live is almost exclusively in buildings. To decide which is the best option for a city it is neccesary to urderstand the avaliable space and the poblation density. Hence, in my opinion, both alternatives could be the most usefull option.
On the one hand, some cities do not have so much space and there are a lot of people living in there. In other words, it is neccesary to find and option that allows many people living in a small location. For example, the city of Tokyo in China or the city of New york in USA. As in these places, where the main idea is to avoid the neccesity of wide ares, buildings are the best solution for big cities.
On the other hand, some regions has a lower poblation density, and a lot of virgin areas to construct houses. In this places, houses are the best solution bacause are cheapper than buildings and the space is not a problem. However, this kind of places often are located far away from the main capital cities. Therefore, this option is better for rural areas than urban ones. For example the city of La Pampa in Argentina, which has the lowest poblation density in the country, has houses as the prodominant option among the habitational solutions,
To conclude, and for all the aforamentioned argumens, both options could be the best option, but while buildings are better for big capital cities due the lack of space, houses on a wider area of land are better for rural or small cities because are chipper.
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security But others believe that people cannot always enjoy their jobs and having a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 73
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 59
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- The chart below gives the information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iving in a small location. For example, the city of Tokyo in China or the city o...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of virgin areas to construct houses. In this places, houses are the best solution ba...
^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...option among the habitational solutions, To conclude, and for all the aforamentio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57192982456 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45020335084 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.5860214676 49.4020404114 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282406721791 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097769654275 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893692530683 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189134099144 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507849329309 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.