Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. some people think there are disadvantages to this. discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is a universally acknowledged fact that nowadays, advertisement is a vital component for marketing. It is sometimes argued that sponsorship of sports goods is detrimental to society. I partly agree with this assertion and below deliberation will discuss both sides of the argument in detail.
To embark upon, it is true that companies do advertise their products when they are sponsoring their goods. Players are provided with free equipment which they are not able to afford at initial stages of their career, which results they do not get distracted by financial worries and their focus is targeted on the game. Furthermore, companies link their names with the famous players, as there is an already established fan following associated with the players which positively impact the sales of the company.
Apparently, with the positive aspects of sports sponsorship, there are some negative consequences. The company's reputation is clearly linked with the player reputation. To quote an instance, recently players get involved in an overdose of drugs, if a particular player is also representing the brand it will be arduous for the company to survive in the market. Additionally, low- quality <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">products</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> can be advertised</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> by </span>some companies which will affect player performance or can be hazardous for health.
In conclusion sponsorship of sports goods can be a boon for the player's holistic development providing state of the art facilities to sports person which will eventually affect country's pride and provide international recognition, albeit there are some negative consequences which one cannot overshadow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | man.11003541 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e argument in detail. To embark upon, it is true that companies do advertise t...
^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ink their names with the famous players, as there is an already established fan f...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the sales of the company. Apparently, with the positive aspects of sports spon...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...player reputation. To quote an instance, recently players get involved in an over...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs get involved in an overdose of drugs, if a particular player is also represent...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
... players holistic development providing state of the art facilities to sports person which will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91472868217 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.15166761311 2.80592935109 148% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4712901016 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136973592039 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060403112809 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434696897123 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871679282883 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035433521757 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.