It is true that the question of whether young people should take part-time works or not remains a source of controversy in some countries. While it seems be unproper and distractful in few countries, I would argue that part-time jobs bring many benefits for students.
At the outset, there are innumerable reasons why encouraging learners to do a job in their free time. For instance, many skills and knowledge that school can not be able to acquire you such as problem solving, communication, time management, etc. will be achieved via taking part in real jobs. Besides they also can start earning money and help their parents reduce financial stress. Though with some teenagers, money is not their reasons to having jobs during school, they still become more independent and grow-up instead of depending on their parents. Hence an CV with many experiences in working before may attract your prospect employer.
On the other hand, some people on opposing side tend to believe that working make students distract from their study at school and university. Making money and spending most of their extra time out of learning can lead to examination failure. With some major, low scores can end their career. For example, doctors, lawyer, scientist need to focus on their studies in place of working part-time. In addition, having side jobs would have some negative effects with young people if they are not well-prepared about constitution or mental health to take responsibilities in work.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to teenager work side jobs if they certainly know how to manage time and balance between studying and working. Student should define their priority when considering whether they should take part-time job or not.
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree? Give your opinion and explain both views. 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 67
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether young people should take part-time work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
... achieved via taking part in real jobs. Besides they also can start earning money and h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... instead of depending on their parents. Hence an CV with many experiences in working ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13898305085 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65057001452 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2721884106 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202668361235 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694098823975 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402858457556 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13591279933 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247560054163 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.