In some countries in Europe, some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job. Other children stay in schools which provide a more general academic education. What should schools do to prepare students for the world of work?
Education is an integral part of everyone's childhood. Children in a few western countries, during their early teens, are taught practical knowledge in educational institutions. However, other institutes have a comparatively more generic curriculum. In this essay, I would be attempting to find a viable option that educational institutions could explore to better educate the working class of the future.
On one hand, educational institutes that teach practical skills are trying to make help students with skills that they might require in the future. This is incredibly useful in today's competitive world. On the other hand, general academic educational institutes teach essential bits of information that are considered preliminary in society. General current information and knowledge work as the backbone to any skill learned in the future.
I believe schools should cater to both practical skills and general academic knowledge in equal measure. As an attempt to cover such a wide array of knowledge in school, educational institutions could increase the amount of time children spend in schools. This could also help working parents drop and pick-up children from school. For instance, parents might be able to drop the children at school in the morning on their way to work and pick them up later in the evening on their way back from work.
In conclusion, western countries try different teaching methods and curriculum depending on the changes and needs in society. I am of the opinion that there are advantages and disadvantages in both, the new and old ways of education. However, the educational organization should collectively create a well-rounded education system that includes the merits from both sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to work' or 'work'.
Suggestion: to work; work
... spend in schools. This could also help working parents drop and pick-up children from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...n schools. This could also help working parents drop and pick-up children from school. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42592592593 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96224296808 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0767083988 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207688770091 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700648345728 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603509062699 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113028173319 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752938263227 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.