It is often observed that the main factor behind the basic health issues in some nations is eating fast food. Therefore, it is believed that the government should implement high tax rates on such food items. In my opinion, take the high tax rates is not a sole solution for such soaring health problems, some other measures should as well.
Firstly, there are many reasons for which people around the globe have their inclination towards fast food. For instance, working people do not have enough time to prepare food; also, they think it is convenient to buy food of their choice. Secondly, the fast food items have a large quantity of sugar, salt and fat, which affect our body badly and obesity is the main adverse result of that. The government should also give incentives to fast food making companies if they promote healthy stuff to the customers.
On the other hand, imposing a high tax on the fast food can only reduce the number of customers, but it is not the only solution, as people will anyway buy food if they do not have time and any better alternates. According to a top magazine survey "The Vitality", around sixty-three percent of the population consume fast food just because they do not have better options. However, exercise routine and amount of portions we take per day matter equally, as most of the home cooked food consumers also face probable health issue with obesity.
In conclusion, the government should not only impose the high tax on fast food but also encourage the people to pursue a healthy lifestyle, also, there should be new attractive alternates for consumers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88768115942 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46202783806 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8191919053 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2727272727 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282508602783 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120146686166 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403917976997 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17811311463 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203669793431 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.