Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes.
Is it sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Growing population is one of the most concerning issue globally. According to the recent reports china’s population is going to be doubled in 2050. In some countries, as a preventive measure, Government is imposing taxes to stabilize growing population. I completely agree to this approach, I shall elaborate my stance with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
There are enormous benefits of levying taxes for birth control to Government. First and the foremost is economic stability. Through this process implementation, Government would be able to collect more taxes from families under and run different state affairs through this amount. Furthermore, Government would be able to save amount that is expected to be spent on under children allowance given to families to raise children and take care of medical and education. For instance, Government have to pay more amount to 5 family members including 3 children; whereas less to the family having only one child.
However, despite having innumerable advantages there are some demerits to this phenomenon
As well. By imposing taxes to control population, there would be scarcity of youth in countries and more population would consist of more old people. For instance, currently in New Zealand, there is a shortage of young people and now their Government is encouraging people around to globe to migrate to their country in order to run companies and business.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, I am of the view that it is rightful for Government to apply taxes as a proactive approach to handle population dilemma. This approach would also strengthen economy. Youth scarcity could be controlled through leniency in this process enforcement. It is advisable to take preventive steps timely such as tax implementation to control the giant issues like population growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...and education. For instance, Government have to pay more amount to 5 family members ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40753424658 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03648569165 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.921310457 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290576285464 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841157716157 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573311160966 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142119006453 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069636333674 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.