Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes.
Is it sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Increase in population is a worldwide phenomenon which is haunting governments around the globe. It can be observed in some countries which took measures to control this issue internally by opting different ways which includes even by imposing taxes on their people. I would agree to aforementioned approach as by imposing such restrictions, expenses can be trimmed down.
By imposing taxes to control population might help countries in managing their expenses in an efficient way hence boosting their economy. For instance, in countries where concept of welfare state is in place, it becomes more difficult for government to manage such massive increase in population as it is directly linked with expenses which incur on medical, education and other allowances for raising kids. A latest development can be seen in China where government imposed penalties on all such parents who have more kids than the government’s decided limits and as a result, a drastic drop can be seen in the population of their certain provinces.
On the contrary, there is a flip side of these restrictions as well. As a result of such approach, people have lost interest in growing their families any further, which make these countries face issue of youth scarcity. In countries like Japan and New Zealand there is a big generation gap which is forcing the governments to invite people from other parts of the globe to work in their part of land as they do not have resources to even run their operations.
To encapsulate, I opine that Government is rightful to impose taxes to control giant issues like population as it is beneficial for financial stability of the country . On the other hand leniency should be given to avoid issues like shortage of young people. In the future, more preventive steps needs to be taken to avoid any disastrous situation against major issues like population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lp countries in managing their expenses in an efficient way hence boosting their economy. For insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For instance, in countries where concept of welfare state is in place, it becomes...
^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
... and other allowances for raising kids. A latest development can be seen in China...
^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these restrictions as well. As a result of such approach, people have lost inter...
^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l for financial stability of the country . On the other hand leniency should be gi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, well, for instance, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07096774194 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87059577369 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4356082093 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26846927533 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966313538412 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572054612104 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161023999404 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387196901294 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.