Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien

It is commonly found that parents purchase toys more than their children required. Even though toys help children to develop their cognitive and analytical skills, many toys not only make children disinterested to analyse a toy fully but also this motivates them to set over expectation throughout a child's life.

There are many benefits which assure while children play with toys.Firstly, interacting with toys help children to analyse and make them able to find a solution for the arrangement of playthings depend on the use. This is very much required when children's mental ability start growing, and this will help children to improve their cognitive skill as well. And this has been scientifically proved in Finland by adopting education through playing.

However, there are many disadvantages of buying many toys for children. Because many toys make children get bore to the gadget and they lose interest to observe the functions. As a result, children's mental growth will not be effective.Furthermore, they fail understand the value of money, and they expect plenty of things in all the areas they live.

In conclusion, although toys play a vital role in children's life to start identifying abilities, many toys increase anxiety on everything.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
...ch assure while children play with toys.Firstly, interacting with toys help children to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ens mental growth will not be effective.Furthermore, they fail understand the value of mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 200.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96856867867 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1499974351 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.222222222 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211865997834 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101126027297 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665742979507 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137347096668 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269932562342 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.