Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
Many parents purchase a plenty number of toys for their children to enjoy with. This essay will discuss advantages of having so many toys for children such as child staying active and learning new things from them. Conversely, there are many disadvantages of these many toys as well including but not limited to turning this into a bad habit of high demands and less social attachment.
To begin with, children who have abundant amount of toys stays engaged with them. They rarely get bored with them as every toy offers different fun from the other. Additionally, these toys are often educational as they teach kids how to operate various machines or are somewhat replica of real life equipment. For example, toys like Lego provide information about how to build houses or apartments and are so intuitive that these children widely enjoy them. For these reasons having so many toys keeps the child engaged towards any task and also provides a plethora of information that is useful for them.
On the other hand, however, there are many disadvantages and one of them is children can get easily spoiled. As parents pamper kids by gifting so many toys, they always expect that they will have everything in abundance in their life and end up getting disappointed if their demand is not fulfilled. Statistics has also proved that the children who had large number of toys have higher tendency of getting into depression if they have shortage of anything. Furthermore, if children are playing with their toys all the time, they don’t go out to make many friends. They are always attached with materialistic items and don’t understand importance of having a social life.
In conclusion, it is evident that there are merits and demerits of having great number of toys. This can make the child energetic and active and also can be educated with useful toys. However, having too much exposure can also spoil them and often limit their social circle in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-03 | aceg1000 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-19 | minhhh123 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | minhhh123 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-30 | giang123456 | 56 | view |
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 91
- International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your position 78
- Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Getting promotions are one of the biggest motivators for hard work in the modern workplace Why are people so driven to receive promotions What other factors motivate people to work hard 84
- Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of jobs should be highly paid? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hem and often limit their social circle in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93957703927 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49811495091 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528700906344 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6226764996 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370175165819 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13265616986 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089390359118 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222366065946 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686146692444 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.