Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People are divided on whether they should accept bad situations or try to improve them. From my perspective, people ought to make efforts to improve uneasy status.
On the one hand, individuals can learn valuable life lessons when they approve of difficult circumstances. For instance, an employee who has a low income would understand the value of money. Then, he can gain money management skills and acquire financial stability. However, the benefits of accepting harsh circumstances is usually limited to the individuals only rather than the whole community. For example, if the employee wanted to advice his friends facing the same hardships, they are not likely to adhere to it deeply as he is no more well-off than them and consequently does not have a strong impression on them.
On the other hand, individuals who improve difficult situations gain better life quality. For example, the employee who works hard and is determined to escape poverty could become successful. Thus, his living standards and that of his family would be improved significantly. Also, if the person does not succeed, his efforts are laudable and would inspire people around him. For example, if an individual takes action to improve his life, others living in the same community would feel emotions, whether they are guilt or admiration. Therefore, the community would become better gradually from a poor neighborhood to a middle class one.
To conclude, the person who accepts negative circumstances can gain intangible merits, however, these valuable knowledge is restricted to him only while the public are usually unaware of them. On the contrary, the person who makes progress to enhance predicaments would benefit both himself and the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | curtistran | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | Cena | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | pourya | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | Surbhi96 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Society is becoming obsessed with material goods like fast cars designer clothes and flashy jewellery We have stopped caring about important things and that is why divorce rate are so high and family bonds are not as strong anymore our value system is dis 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e efforts to improve uneasy status. On the one hand, individuals can learn v...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t have a strong impression on them. On the other hand, individuals who impro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30324909747 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81198471048 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.598695859 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135637557172 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518999807257 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622490211083 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952721792271 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639780457883 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.