Some people believe that it is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to a horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people think that area with highrise buildings is good, in terms of staying and working. While others think that place with lesser highrise apartments is better. Before putting forward my opinion, I will shed some light on both viewpoints.
The are two main reasons for people to prefer cities with tall buildings. Firstly, if people live in a city then they have ample options to choose a house for renting or purchasing. Hence, the person can easily choose a good accommodation as per his needs. Secondly, most of the big companies prefer to open their offices in well developed areas with reasonably good infrastructure. Thus, such places have increased number of job opportunities due to presence of multiple organisations. For instance, as per the recent report published by Times magazine, 70% of the people who immigrated to bigger cities got job within first 15 days of shifting.
While some people are in favor of places with lesser high-rise buildings because of the better environment and easy process to start their own business. First, these areas are generally less populated, resulting in less vehicles are used by the them. Therefore, the environment of these sectors is usually better. Second, such places are good for entrepreneurs because of lenient business rule policies by the government in order to attract investors. Therefore, people with mindset of opening their new business are inclined to settle in such areas. For example, as per a recent survey by Harvard University, 70% of the entrepreneurs setup their business in less populous area and they were able to achieve 50% profit in 6 months.
To conclude, while staying in area with lesser highrise apartments have it's own benefits, I believe life in cities with tall buildings are better because of the easy possibility to get a home and increased career opportunities. I have personally lived in such area and all the amenities are available nearby to live a quality life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... good, in terms of staying and working. While others think that place with lesser hig...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... if people live in a city then they have ample options to choose a house for rent...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good accommodation'.
Suggestion: good accommodation
...ng. Hence, the person can easily choose a good accommodation as per his needs. Secondly, most of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. While some people are in favor of places with lesser high-rise buildings b...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... generally less populated, resulting in less vehicles are used by the them. Therefor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
... resulting in less vehicles are used by the them. Therefore, the environment of these se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'entrepreneurs'' or 'entrepreneur's'?
Suggestion: entrepreneurs'; entrepreneur's
...urvey by Harvard University, 70% of the entrepreneurs setup their business in less populous a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09287925697 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78374144294 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1839230626 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7647058824 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253500175769 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079693847086 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830586216709 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154856985447 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451472789062 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.