Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities. Others, however, think that horizontal cities are better for living and working.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is believed by some people that modernization and increasing numbers of populations are the reason behind a rapid change in housing and workspace amongst Metropolitan cities. These big cities tend to develop the areas either in vertical or horizontal formation. In my perspective, depending on how economic aspect and enviromental issues influence the vast development of the two.
The vertical city, the first type of city, it is usually develope in the area of central business and living space, which provided affordable living cost and comfortable place. These developments bring advantages for companies in terms of cost, the enterprises will not financially suffer since building new working space is expensive. Furthermore, living in the skyward house would be pleasure and comfortable, meaning that people who lives in apartment mostly be saved from natural disaster such as flood or landslide. However, the city also has given birth of environmental risks, such as garbage management, increasing heat temperature and land subsidence.
Moving to another type of cities is the horizontal city, it is usually found in major cities amongst developing countries such as Indonesia. The city is commonplace to live in since providing a large land to build house, property prices tend to much more affordable as compared to skyward housing and also perceived by some people the city is future investment. On the other hand, building horizontal area for working is benefical to enviroment, the cities would be more sustain to enlarge green area, by installing garden space into the fomation. Although, the main problem with these cities include reducing access of clear water and densely populated.
To give my opinion as a summary, I would state that the vertical cities more beneficial for industralization. In contrast, as the horizontal cities as common living space for people in developed country, sounds likely to last very long in investment. I believe vertical city are more convincing to confront a future development.
- Some people find history a fascinating subject Others says it is dull and has no place in modern life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assesing students through exams rather than continual assesment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assesment 73
- Some people think enviromental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your reason 73
- The car disastrous 20th century invention that has made the world s cities more dangerous and polluted as well as being responsible for the death of millions of people in car accidents 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...nd to build house, property prices tend to much more affordable as compared to sky...
^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'confronting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: confronting
...lieve vertical city are more convincing to confront a future development.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.378125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97377699389 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571875 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1967736547 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316366311136 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108492142822 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535765203672 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200605422854 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679604915721 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.