Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, there are contradictory beliefs regarding the spread of information. One set of people believes that it is beneficial to dispense as much data as it is possible in scientific research, business, and academia, while others disagree. From my vantage point, some information has to be kept confidential.
One the one hand, the spread of information in scientific research, business and academic world enhances the knowledge of people in different classes of society. To be more specific, they can improve their level of knowledge as well as following their passion and talent equally without being worried about hefty fees. For example, if African people had access to free educational and business materials it would help them shake off their literacy as well as giving them the opportunity to improve their living conditions.
On the other hand, there is some information which is not only valuable and important but also threatening to the peacefulness of the society. In other words, such information falls into the wrong hand, it might be used for detrimental proposes. Consider the handmade bomb which can cause a major disaster and chaos in society as an example. Every day, hundreds of Afghans fall victim to these bombs built by the criminals who gained access to the scientific procedures of how to make one. Therefore, some information has to be kept away from ordinary people to have a safer society.
In conclusion, this essay discussed both sides of the argument regarding the sharing of information. While there might be situations in which having access to information can be beneficial, I strongly believe that the freedom of sharing some information could cause an irreversible outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...es that it is beneficial to dispense as much data as it is possible in scientific re...
^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation has to be kept confidential. One the one hand, the spread of informat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27898550725 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89978913762 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8120619046 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.076923077 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346693608316 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112725924297 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845891585473 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208635570103 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713534881204 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.