Some people believe that mobile phone conversations should be banned in crowded and social places. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, almost every person owns a smartphone due to technological advancements. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that phone conversation in public areas should be restricted while others oppose this notion. Certainly, I withstand with the other section of individuals because phone calls cannot be ignored in the event of an emergency whether it is a public place or a private condo.
On the one side, various factors make a section of people advocate that answering phone calls in public areas should be banned for several reasons. The first and foremost is that talking on the phone in open places are a serious source of distraction and annoyance. To illustrate, if a person answers their phone in the cinema theatre, the audience sitting near to that person feel annoyed and distracted. Apart from this, it is not uncommon to see some people using abusive language during conversing on calls with someone, which is inappropriate in public places such as parks. Consequently, youngsters might be influenced by such kind of language which will be a bad impact on society. Therefore, there seems to be a point in this prohibition.
On the flip side, some individuals believe restricting phone calls in public places will not work has a positive development for two prime reasons. Firstly, some phone calls require urgent attention such as emergencies at home, or at work. Under such circumstances, ignoring a call is not the right course of action because a person's life could be at risk. Besides, to save the life of any person, it is required to call an ambulance if a person is at any place, so, in such cases, phone calls cannot be ignored.
In my profound opinion, there should practice in attending phone calls between public place and private place such as to invent a software in phones to know the priority of calls. With this invention, a person will understand and know whether to attend a call or not. However, I do understand the case of disturbance of the environment, but banning all phone calls is wrong and unfeasible. Therefore, an individual should know the importance of place and phone call, which is also known as phone conversation ettiqutes in condo and public places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-01 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 67 | view |
- Some people think that young people should be ambitious Others believe that it is fine if young people do not have big aims in life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Your friend has just won a sizeable amount of money in the lottery She would like your advice as to how to spend it Write a letter to your friend In your letter congratulate him her on their win give practical advice on how to spend the money advise him h 84
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to your friend In your letter give details of your study plans explain why you w 78
- You are unable to attend a farewell party of a colleague at work Write a letter to him her In your letter you should say why you can t come give him her your best wishes suggest another time and place for you to meet 84
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour Write a letter to your neighbour In your letter introduce yourself describe your plans for the party invite your neighbour to co
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ot the right course of action because a persons life could be at risk. Besides, to save...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84678351551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517150395778 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6039274986 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.470588235 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237577728598 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834113705023 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482832703415 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158673426718 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310953643195 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.