Some people believe that mobile phone conversations should be banned in crowded and social places Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Technology plays a crucial role in communication. There is an ongoing debate that while passing through busy locations cell phone communication should be prohibited or not. A group of individuals claim that a phone conversation is not good in public places whereas others disagree. Therefore, in upcoming paragraphs, this essay will discuss both sides and explain why using mobile in social places should not be banned but we can use text messages instead.

Examining the former opinion, those who prefer to use cell phones in public places are responsible for creating a disturbance. There is a plethora of places such as libraries, and hospitals where individuals prefer noise-free environment. As a result, people need to put their phones in silence mode or should be prohibited in order to create noise-free surroundings. A survey was conducted at Guru Nanak Dev University regarding the usage of phones, especially in libraries. Thus, concluded that about 80 percent students, are responsible for creating a disturbance in the library.

On the contrary, some people argue that it is fine to utilize such technology is fine anytime and anywhere. This is because a person who receives, an important or emergency call from home, does not need to find an empty place to communicate with their family. If so, this will create a serious problem for that person and his family. In addition to this, everybody has right to use their mobile gadgets independently rather than looking for empty places.

In conclusion, in light of the above-discussed factors, it is crystal clear that mobile phones should not be prohibited, whereas in my opinion they can use alternate methods text messages in order to avoid obstacles that discussed in this essay.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locations'' or 'location's'?
Suggestion: locations'; location's
... debate that while passing through busy locations cell phone communication should be proh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'methods'' or 'method's'?
Suggestion: methods'; method's
...as in my opinion they can use alternate methods text messages in order to avoid obstacl...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19434628975 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94139845054 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600706713781 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2857718894 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243149831691 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708663928762 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676994826053 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146668466947 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777704109546 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.