Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion.
The question of how to achieve success in sports is becoming increasingly controversial. While some people think that one has to have an innate ability to succeed at sports, others believe that one has to work hard and practise in order to excel at sports. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and explain why I believe that hard work and practice is more essential to be successful at sports.
Some people believe that one has to possess an inborn ability to excel at sports. They have justifiable reason to believe this because certain sports require innate skills which cannot be acquired through hard work or practice. For example, studies have shown that people from certain tribes in Kenya are born with athletic skills so they can easily win races. These skills are hereditary. For this reason, these people believe that natural abilities are required to excel at sports.
As opposed to the above-mentioned view, other people believe that with consistent practice and hard work, one can excel at sports and I agree. This is because a person is bound to fail, regardless of how talented he or she is, without consistent practice and hard work. Research has shown that children born with athletic skills tend to lose these skills in their teenage years if they do not include a regimen of consistent practice and hard work in their daily activities. The above-mentioned reason is why these people believe that hard work and practice is more important in succeeding in sports.
In conclusion, despite the varying opinion of people, I believe that one has to consistently practise and work hard, rather than rely on natural abilities, in order to be successful at sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Dhruvik goswami | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | mahiitab | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | jasvinder kaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Gagan Cheema | 56 | view |
Comments
It is irrefutable that sports
It is irrefutable that sports play a vital role in individual's life . Different people have distinct mindset. It is believed by some people that one has to have inheritance ability to get success at sports,whereas other opine that one has to work hard and do more practice to expert at sport . However, in my opinion, Working hard could be got success at sports. This essay will cast light on both sights before making any final conclusion.
To commence with the first notion , there are myriad things to shared in the first statement. First and foremost is that natural ability can help once to get success in sports like they just need Minor strategy of sport and need less practice . As a result , those who pisses inherence ability , who can learn quick and get progress very fast . Besides this , they can boost their confidence and it helps to excel at sports. To examplify, Kenya are born with athletic skills so they can easily win races due to natural skill.
However, other believe that working hard and more practicing is the proper way to get success in sports because practice is an integral part of sports . As a result, even person who have great desire to get success on particular sport and too much intriguing on sport, thus they can become successful at sports owing to the hard work . Although, no need for any skill on sport. Hence , people can get excellent at sports with practice and except any skills.
Having discuss arguments and counter arguments, I would like to infer that one has to consistently practice and work hard , rather than natural abilities to achieve goal in sports.
In conclusion, it can be said that as " every coin has two sides " , in the same manner, indicate varying opinion of people are imparetive and cannot be denied.
Natural ability or, hard work
Natural ability or, hard work and practice?
The argument(s) is , IMO, A false paradigm.
I would support the notion that natural ability will indeed win the day.However, the arguments advanced in the article are constructed in such a way that it becomes an ”either-or” situation, the consequences will be a skewed conclusion because we all know that natural ability alone will not be enough alone to win the day. Misrepresenting the true argument produces a false positive.
The true argument is now advanced ;Those with a natural ability in the area defined who work just as hard as their opponents, practice just as hard as their opponents, are the likely victor against competitors who do not have natural abilities.The greater their natural abilities, the higher the likelihood of their victory.
Across the spectrum of sports, every world champion worked hard to become world champion,yet others worked just as hard or harder but could not beat them,WHY?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95789473684 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59688000883 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9253317318 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449141066229 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180664814312 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127725729176 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306189708424 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898988741952 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.