Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, rapid development in technology made individuals to have many options in planning their future. Even people are able to do international businesses by staying at different place. Increased globalisation also leaving individuals with rapid choices. I agree to this argument and giving my explanation in the following passage.
On one hand, people have various choices to get settled in life. Firstly, people must be able to adjust and be ready to do any kind of work. However, practical knowledge helps people to get into different fields. Also, individuals have a chance to get trained in particular work and getting employed in a company. Accordingly, people often with failure records in education are also having bright future in different businesses. In recent days, people are even doing online business often by sitting in home with the usage of modern technology. For instance, my cousin who didn't have minimum education is running a successful business in my hometown by providing an online service to the customers. Often, he is earning more profits with a huge turnover.
On the other hand, people with only educational knowledge will obviously have less choices. Even though, they have subject knowledge they cannot get employed in higher companies as they do not have skills to apply them on hands. Instead, it will lead to unemployment in their career. For example, one of my friend who is topper during my college days is now in a low position in his office due to lack of practical knowledge.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that people have various options to have a successful life it all depends on effective work one can do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- The qualities and skills that a person requires to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid 61
- Essay topics A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday Write a letter to your friend In your letter give contact details for where you are away give instructions about how to care for your pet describe other household d 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...technology. For instance, my cousin who didnt have minimum education is running a suc...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun choices is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ucational knowledge will obviously have less choices. Even though, they have subject...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in particular, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10954063604 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77964105149 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593639575972 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2592154366 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0588235294 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194873662672 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604800357182 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461553117593 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122226296361 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269750602128 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...technology. For instance, my cousin who didnt have minimum education is running a suc...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun choices is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ucational knowledge will obviously have less choices. Even though, they have subject...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in particular, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10954063604 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77964105149 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593639575972 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2592154366 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0588235294 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194873662672 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604800357182 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461553117593 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122226296361 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269750602128 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.