At present, people have different views about availability of choices, while some people support the view that we have many choices according to our priorities and taste. I completely agree to this statement, that we have enough choices in our modern lives.
Choices of people vary according to their personalities, for instance, some people always eager to eat spicy food but many do not consider it as healthy food and they avoid these kind of foods. Nevertheless, both type of foods available almost everywhere such as, in parks and workplaces. But our ancestors cannot able to experience such choices in past, due to unavailability of hotels and fast food outlets. Similarly, in terms of shopping we also have many choices. Take an example, currently, people have option to go to markets or buy online without going anywhere, from different websites such as, Daraz and Amazon. Using these websites, an individual can buy everything of his choice namely, cars, motorbikes and several other things of daily use.
When we come to housing, there are also a huge number of options available for customers, for instance, a customer can buy a house in commercial area or in a housing scheme according to his priority, choices in this department also vary according to sizes and furnishing of houses. Moreover, a person can also select a job according to his preference. For instance, an employee can do a job in private or public sector, anyone can also change his or her job according to his schedule thus, if a person want to do a job at night rather than daytime, he can apply in night shifts. But, in ancient times night jobs was not available due to lack electricity in many areas. People of this era can also develop different kind of relationships on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
In conclusion, it seems to me that, currently, we have much choices in every field of life. Moreover, these choices are also economical easily accessible from almost every part of world.
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many However there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The chart below show information about consumer decision regarding mobile phone purchases in two different countries 67
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...sider it as healthy food and they avoid these kind of foods. Nevertheless, both type of fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... cannot able to experience such choices in past, due to unavailability of hotels and fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...it seems to me that, currently, we have much choices in every field of life. Moreove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96470588235 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75050168434 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.400662248 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232123943612 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086409053694 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823728261158 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166586767841 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100511347016 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...sider it as healthy food and they avoid these kind of foods. Nevertheless, both type of fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... cannot able to experience such choices in past, due to unavailability of hotels and fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...it seems to me that, currently, we have much choices in every field of life. Moreove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96470588235 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75050168434 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.400662248 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232123943612 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086409053694 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823728261158 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166586767841 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100511347016 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.