There is a currently contentious argument about whether people have enough choices. I somewhat disagree with this notion because it can be beneficial with too many options in job choosing and meal section. Nevertheless, that may be disadvantaged for some people losing time when they are shopping.
First of all, it is helpful that have the chance to decide the type of work because individuals can improve career satisfy and work efficiency working in the preferred industry and post. In contrast, it is limited to a person's ability if he has not a talent to do one job but has no choice to do it. For example, people had no alternative but only farming in the ancient year when that time only have agriculture in the world.
Another help for many choices is entertainment from different kinds of food. That choice makes people enjoying life when they delight on the various flavour dishes. For instance, banquet and buffet have diverse food, which everyone can satisfy his appetite, so they are popular. On the other hand, it is boring to eat the same without an alternative for each day. Moreover, it is not healthy for that kind of diet for no choice with a lot of ingredients.
However, sometimes people feel too varying decisions for shopping since it wast of time. To more precise, some goods normally have the same functions or shaps that confuse shilly-shally customers to spend time on selection. To illustrate, some clients will use a lot of time to buy clothes even though the clothes are all beautiful.
In conclusion, I somewhat disagree with the opinion that we have numerous choices because that benefits help us with job and food enjoyment. How too many choices also wast time in shopping. Given this situation, we use the many choices but do not hesitate on petty things.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...d post. In contrast, it is limited to a persons ability if he has not a talent to do on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85064935065 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63931285363 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6871703183 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8823529412 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198145638897 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652396996293 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450831181754 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118527122 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613380313298 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.