Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree?Why?
There is a widespread belief that modern society should replace employees who have crossed 55 years of age. Although some people believe retiring people above 55 been a negative development, I, however, feel it has had a positive impact in making the organization more productive.
Firstly, recruiting youngsters would impart fresh ideas which might rejuvenate a company. Further, due to the change in the education system young people acquire more innovative programs which often help an organization to grow swiftly. While I concede that high-level employees possess vast experience, as well as their advice, are worthy, the problem is aged people are less active and sharp than youngsters. A good illustration of this development is the new start-up company mostly prefer to hire a young individual. On the other hand, older people take advantage of pension schemes or they commence their own company.
Unemployment is another area of concern. Many developing nation faces a problem of lack of job opportunities among youth. Many supporters who believe to work until 65 years claim that people should be allowed to work for many years since they can contribute to the company with better skills and knowledge. However, I would argue that this trend will boost economic repercussions. Consequently, office positions will be taken by the elder generation instead of young ones. Thus, in order to keep the nation’s economy healthy, the certain age limit is to be strictly defined and fair chances to young generation have to be provided. To exemplify, if cricketers like Sachin Tendulkar and Kapil Sharma had not retired, then we could never get our marvelous Captain MS Dhoni under whose guidance our team won the World Cup.
To conclude, not only aged people are sluggish, but they also enhance unemployment among young people. Therefore, although I acknowledge that older people have sound knowledge of respective fields, I firmly agree people older than 55 years should give up work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-13 | Bisiolat21 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-23 | adreel | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-09 | kjot_59 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | jellyb0711 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | Bhargav Bonthapalli | 82 | view |
- Many young people regularly change jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase the tax on petrol (gasoline). Would advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- With deforestation, urban development and illegal hunting, many animal species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction.Do you think it is important to protect animals? What measures can be 67
- Many criminals commit further crime as soon as they are released from prison. What do you think are the causes of this? What possible solutions can you suggest? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whose guidance we won the World Cup. To conclude, not only aged people are sl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28881987578 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80506308674 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664596273292 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9656376411 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240508495627 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608724149351 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611288529972 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142728018991 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044162359821 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.