Some people believe that parents should limit their children hours of watching tv and playing computer games, but encourage to read books. Do you agree or disagree

At present, technology has been infiltrated in essential parts of daily life. It is hard to imagine about life without technology. Technology has been an important factor in our lives in every ages. Children is one of those who have to spend their lives with technology. In these days, lots of children own the gadgets in order to assist their lives and entertaining themselves as well. However, there are a conflict nowadays about spending the time with these gadgets. Some says that parents should set the time limit for technology as a relaxation; for instance, watching television and playing computer games and let their own children do something else such as reading books while others say that we do not have to. In my opinion, parents should limit the children’s time to watch television and playing games with overabundant reasons.

Even though watching television and playing games provide some benefits for them as the entertainment and education, spending time on these things too much might affects the health. One of those issues is that spending time too much on the television affects the eyesight and obesity. Lots of research findings nowadays claim that prolonged television watching television provides the high risk of developing obesity and diabetes. Furthermore, the ray from the television screen provides the deleterious effects to the eyesight. The detrimental effects to health of the children is considered as one of the reasons why parents should limit the time watching television and playing computer games.

Not only watching the television and playing computer games affect the health, but it also provides the negative effects of the behavior. Watching too much television and playing computer games affect the responsibility, the routine, and else more. Playing games and watching television for long term provide the addictive behavior of the children. Since children develop the addictive behavior of watching television and playing games, it will become disturb to the activities and duties, such as doing homework, playing sports, rehearse music, and else more. For worse case, it leads to the bad behavior of becoming the irresponsible person.

Notwithstanding it is the fact that children can gain knowledge from watching television and playing computer games, watching and playing without the limitation turn these things to be negative instead. If gaining knowledge and entertaining are the reasons why children should watch television and play computer games, there are alternative ways that provide these positive outcome as well. One of those alternative ways is to read the books. Reading books is another good way of gaining knowledge and entertaining. Reading books can get the knowledge from the content that they have read, the writing styles, and else more. Some might say that children can gain knowledge through the internet; however, spending a lot of time still affects to health as aforementioned. Therefore, these are the reasons why parents should limit time watching television and playing computer games and encourage children to read the books.

All in all, these aforementioned reasons clearly support why parents should set the time limit of watching television and playing games and encourage students to read books. Additionally, in order to control their children by providing little time watching television and playing computer games, parents should provide the constructive reasons why parents have to. Providing reasons makes children understand the reason and make them feel that they are not forced to do.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aying games with overabundant reasons. Even though watching television and play...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 10.4138276553 278% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3040.0 1615.20841683 188% => OK
No of words: 562.0 315.596192385 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40925266904 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77668796843 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393238434164 0.561755894193 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 913.5 506.74238477 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5327318214 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326715006159 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107199961659 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100235754 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218003181155 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636757326142 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.