Some people believe that robots will replace classroom teachers in the near future.
To what extent do you agree or disagee?
It is believed that human teachers will be replaced by the artificially intelligent teachers in the foreseeable future. However, I disagree with this statement because of various factors.
At the outset, the prediction of the replacement of teachers by robots would not be possible because of unnecessary investments. To hire the services of advanced robotic technologies, a big chunk of money will be required. Nonetheless, human educators will be available at relatively cheaper wages. Moreover, robotic teachers might be suffered from a lack of flexibility. It is because they would not be able to understand the emotional state of their students. Having controlled by their internal processor, these machines could deliver longer lectures without accessing the learner's interest level. For instance, contemporary scientists are still struggling to inculcate emotional intelligence in robots.
Furthermore, there will be a human resource problem with the introduction of robot teachers in the institutes. As if all the teaching work will be taken from the machines, there may be unemployment problems for humans. For instance, the revolution of automatic machinery in factories caused such a scenario during the 1960s. What is more, pupils may not outperform due to less interest in their academicians by this approach. It is witnessed that students perform better in their curriculum, where they have a mutual understanding with providers. By opening their hearts to their teachers, they can grasp the knowledge efficiently. Varying grades in academic subjects are a good example of its that depicts the effectiveness of interest level in a particular teacher that would not be possible in case of A.I. Robots.
In conclusion, it is argued that the need for human teachers will be demolished due to Robot tutors. Nevertheless, the factors such as cost, rigid teaching methods, unemployment and low-interest levels are the main reason for my disagreement with the above-said notion.
- Some people say that parents should place restrictions on the hours of their children spend watching TV and playing computer games, and encourage them to spend this time reading books instead. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. THEY SAY THAT THE ONLY WAY TO INCREASE RECYCLING IS FOR GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE IT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU THINK LAWS ARE NEEDED TO MAKE PEOPLE RECYCLE MORE OF THEIR WAS 56
- One of your friends recently had a birthday celebration, but you missed it and you forget to tell your friend that you couldn't attend. Write a letter -explain why you missed it -explain why you didn't tell your friend -and say what you would li 73
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- You are working in an international company. You want to quit your job. Write a letter to your manager why you want to quit when you want to leave what you like about the company 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53921568627 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1500504991 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2292169193 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140619237577 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051971820079 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685840097354 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107739410592 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508252863569 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.